Archive for the ‘Book Review’ Category

Book Review: Heiland

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2005

Heiland, by Franklin Sanders. 276 pages. Available through Draught Horse Press for $10.

Heiland is the German word for “savior”. It’s also the surname of the protagonist in this story. The book is set in Tennessee in the year 2020. When Franklin Sanders wrote this in 1986, 2020 probably seemed as far in the future as 1984 did to Orwell.

The story itself is not particularly good. The plot largely serves as an opportunity for the author to trace out some political and cultural themes, to describe what an explicitly Christian agrarian society might look like, and to present a few short essays - disguised as monologues - on politics, economics, the intersection of faith and politics, etc.

Sanders describes a future in which America (or at least Tennessee; little is said about the other states) is divided into the wicked urban Insiders and the godly, rural Freemen. We learn that the population has shrunk vastly among the Insiders, due to government-subsidized aggressive abortion and euthanasia policies. We see a Big Brother-like government that actively tracks its citizens, using microchips embedded in their right hands. The borders of cities are sealed - ostensibly to control drug trafficking - and only approved travel is permitted. The federal government has expanded to the point that state legislatures have been relegated to an advisory capacity only.

The Freemen, on the other hand, live mostly simple agrarian lives. The average family size among Freemen is seven. They are free, mostly choosing agrarian pursuits and cottage industries. They live not so much in rebellion against the government, but simply ignore it in general. Not all rural and small town dwellers are Freemen, but their seems to be either a majority or a sizable minority in each county, enough to ensure that they are mostly left alone.

The story winds its way through Tennessee fifteen years hence, enough to show us the horrors of Insider society and give a reasonably good look at Freemen society. It shows how the Freemen government works, describes the church a little, goes into some detail about the militia-style military system, other economic tidbits, and general Freemen culture. We also get a reasonably good look at Insider culture, replete with superfluous atrocities and caricaturized villains. The story reaches its climax as the Insiders attack the Freemen to bring them into “voluntary compliance” with the tracking, identification, and tax requirements of the government.

The strengths of this book include a fairly comprehensive overview of both Freemen and Insider culture. Sanders mentions enough specifically, and alludes to enough, to show us where our secular culture might be heading and what a more godly culture might look like. He does a good job demonstrating some degree of continuity between the Freemen and our past, quoting politicians and theologians from the time of the American Revolution and the US Civil War.

As far as weaknesses go, I’ve already mentioned a fairly weak story line. He also does too much hand waving and chalking up problems to sci-fi technical wizardry, such as anti-gravity machines and weapons that can create gigantic fireballs or suck the heat out of an area. I think the book would have been better without some of the monologues, without so much political and military detail, and with more description of Heiland’s day-to-day life and the society he lived in. The final showdown between the Insiders and Freemen could have been written on a smaller scale and without the technological wizardry.

It is a quick read, and I think a worthwhile purchase at only 10 Federal Reserve Notes. This is not a book for children. It is perhaps over the top, and implausible. But if nothing else, Heiland at least will help make you aware of dangerous trends within our society, where they might lead, and what a godly culture might look like.

Wild Animus

Sunday, June 6th, 2004

I just finished reading Wild Animus. It was very engaging and well written. I couldn’t put it down. The interspersal of Sam’s manuscript within the novel drew me in. The intentional ambiguity between Sam’s writing of a ram, his “transformation” into a ram, and the ram as a metaphor for his life, was well done and added to the novel tremendously.

Imagine that a pagan hippie took a lot of acid while reading Wild At Heart, and took the whole book very literally. The result in his life might look an awful lot like the story of Wild Animus. Seriously, that was my very first thought about the book.

Sam’s pursuit of Animus has some common ground with Christianity, but most of that would also be common with many religions. A Creator. Humans created in the Creator’s image. Victory through surrender to the Creator’s will. The passionate pursuit of the Creator. There’s also a similarity to eastern philosophy along the lines of “all is one”.

And much of Sam’s philosophy echoes Wild At Heart. The pursuit of your dreams as the way to thaw your frozen heart. A woman’s need for a passionate man, and to be included in that passionate pursuit of his dream.

But Animus is far inferior to Jehovah. Sam’s pursuit of Animus is a highly selfish one. Sam is an aspiring author who depends on his wife to support him as he pursues his dream in frivolous ways. He is cowardly, pathetic, and selfish. He denies her the support, stability, and family that she needs, and he ultimately abandons her. The pursuit of Animus demands such selfishness. Jehovah cannot be served selfishly; service and pursuit of Him demands _selflessness_ and service to others, not _selfishness_.

The pursuit of Animus is largely undirected - there is no point to it. Jehovah gives Adam a mission, at least. Sam gets no such guidance from Animus. Rich Mullins sang once of the futility of adivce such as “follow you heart” - it only leads to your chest - and “follow your nose” - the direction changes every time you turn your head. There is no direction (”north and west” hardly counts) to the quest for Animus. Be passionate. Follow your dreams. Great, but how do you know if your dreams are worthy? What if your dream is an evil one? How do you know when you’re on the right track and making progress?

This is highlighted in the imagery of the ram. A ram might be a fine looking animal, but what is it good for? What can a ram do? A ram can barely defend itself; mostly it just runs. The pursuit of Animus includes cutting loose of any center; it’s just running.

Jehovah, on the other hand, tells man to “be fruitful and multiply” and “subdue the earth” - to establish His kingdom here. He calls us not to run, but to fight and build. We are well centered and grounded.

Animus demands not just Sam’s surrender, but his sacrifice. That is the path to reunification with the molten heart of Animus. Jehovah sacrifices Himself for us. That provides the means of reunification with Him.

And Sam ends the story not as a victor like Christ, or even as a martyr, but as a pathetic lunatic. He does not complete the liturgy of the ram, or even surrender to the pack. He goes out not with a bang, but a whimper. Quite an unsatisfying end to a passionate pursuit of the divine, or even of one’s own dream.

_Wild Animus_ - good book, bad philosophy.