Archive for November, 2003

Family News

Tuesday, November 25th, 2003

My wife had an ob/gyn appointment on Monday. The doctor confirmed that everything is healed up.

My brother’s wife is expecting, due in July I think. That’s all three couples. It’s funny to me. My brother, my bro-in-law, and I are going to have to form a support group probably. :-)
My cousin, who I wrote about eariler, lost her baby on Sunday night. She’s currently in the hospital due to blood loss. After all they’ve been through, to lose the baby must be even more bitter than it would otherwise.

My sister, who is 6 months pregnant, was rushed to the hospital last night with a LOT of bleeding. She has placenta previa, and is in the hospital until tomorrow probably, and then will be on bed-rest for a week or more. The baby is fine, but the danger is that my sister will hemorrhage and die if she starts bleeding again. The doctor is giving her some kind of medicine to help her baby’s lungs develop, just in case they have to deliver early. He’s given her a 25% chance for the placenta to move; otherwise she’ll have to have a C-section a week or so before she’s due. A century ago this condition would have been catastrophic and killed both the baby and the mama; today it’s a little bit scary but mostly just a huge inconvenience to keep her on bedrest.

I wish God had made it so people laid eggs like birds.

Community

Tuesday, November 25th, 2003

God’s church has many responsibilities - preaching and teaching, ministry, prayer, mercy, outreach, fellowship, and so on. But none of these are what the church _is_. The church is not a school, not a charity, not a prayer group. The church _is_ a community.

2 Timothy 2:14 You, however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of, knowing from whom you have learned them, (NAS)

The next few verses in this passage are well known statements about the sufficiency and inspiration of scripture. Paul writes this in an epistle that is primarily about encouraging Timothy to be bold in the faith. Paul says hey, you’re going to struggle, you’ll be persecuted, and you’ll be opposed by many false teachers. But you’ve shared my faith, my struggles, my perseverance. The false teachers are going to get worse, but you continue in the things you have learned.

Paul here gives Timothy two “anchors” for his faith. Two things to remember when you start to doubt. One of the anchors is the inerrant, verbally inspired Word of God. Paul enumerates four functions of the Bible and asserts its divine origin.

But the Word is not the first anchor Paul gives Timothy. The first anchor is “Remember who you learned your faith from.” Remember what sort of people they were. Remember their behavior. Remember how they lived out their faith. Remember those who went long before you. Remember those who are around you now.

The Bible is the source of authority. The lives of other believers is the laboratory. That’s where we see the truths of the Bible “field tested”. Yes, memorize Scripture, by all means. But also, remember _people_. Remember lives. Remember who taught you what you know, and remember that their lives prove they weren’t lying.

We have a responsibility to look at the lives of others to see what Christianity should look like. And we have a responsibility to model the faith for each other.

Our responsibilities don’t end there, though.

Hebrews 10:24-25 is the primary passage used to encourage Christians to attend church regularly.

Hebrews 10
24 and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds,
25 not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near.

I think it’s instructive that preaching and teaching are not mentioned here. Encouragement, accountability, community - those are the things that the church gives you that you can’t get elsewhere. I can buy commentaries and theological books. Church is for things you can’t get from books alone.

Don’t misunderstand - preaching and teaching and prayer and all those things are absolutely essential. I teach a theology class; if anyone is going to believe in the value of teaching, it’s me. But even my theology class is not the end-all and be-all of the church. Church is a community.

My wife ran into a woman we used to be good friends with but haven’t seen in a couple of years. And shame on us for neglecting them. In the past several months, the life of this family has really gone south. The church we all went to had split, and although we plugged into another community of faith, they didn’t. One of the things this lady told my wife was, “It just felt like there was nobody there for us” during the tough times they’ve had.

When my wife told me about this, it felt like someone had punched me. I felt awful. I let those people down. I had and have a responsibility to them, and I failed them. “Someone” _should_ have been there for them. “Someone” should have been _me_.

I used to think of my Christian life as pretty much a silo. Christianity is an individual relationship, just me and God, right/ Well, sort of. But not really. More recently, I’ve come to recognize my connection to the rest of the church. I have a responsibility to them, and they to me.

I am part of a community that has been around for 2,000 years (or more, depending on your ecclesiology). I am not walking this path alone. Other, better saints have gone before me and blazed this trail. Others are coming behind me, and I must do what I can to smooth their path. And others are walking with me. I should draw encouragement and inspiration from them, and give it to them.

Just some stuff that’s been on my heart recently.

I Love Your Law

Monday, November 17th, 2003

[If you think this post is directed at you, it isn't, so please don't take it that way. Regardless what conversations you and I may or may not have had in the distant or recent or immediate past. Really. Please don't take offense.]

In Matthew 9, the Pharisees criticized Jesus for attending a reception Matthew gave in His honor after Christ had called Matthew. (This is one of the four times the Bible records Jesus “dining with” or “receiving” sinners.)

In response, Jesus tells them that they need to go learn what it means, “I desire compassion, and not sacrifice”.

One man who clearly understood this was King David. He wrote, in Psalm 51:16-17, “For you do not delight in sacrifice, otherwise I would give it; You are not pleased with burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a borken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, You will not despise”.

This is the same man who wrote Psalm 119. Some excerpts follow:

How blessed are those whose way is blameless,
Who walk in the law of the LORD.
How blessed are those who observe His testimonies,
Who seek Him with all their heart.
I have rejoiced in the way of Your testimonies,
As much as in all riches.
I will meditate on Your precepts
And regard Your ways.
Open my eyes, that I may behold
Wonderful things from Your law.
Your testimonies also are my delight;
They are my counselors.
Make me understand the way of Your precepts,
So I will meditate on Your wonders.
My soul weeps because of grief;
Strengthen me according to Your word.
Remove the false way from me,
And graciously grant me Your law.
Make me walk in the path of Your commandments,
For I delight in it.
And I will walk at liberty,
For I seek Your precepts.
I shall delight in Your commandments,
Which I love.
At midnight I shall rise to give thanks to You
Because of Your righteous ordinances.
Before I was afflicted I went astray,
But now I keep Your word.
If Your law had not been my delight,
Then I would have perished in my affliction.
I will never forget Your precepts,
For by them You have revived me.
O how I love Your law!
It is my meditation all the day.
How sweet are Your words to my taste!
Yes, sweeter than honey to my mouth!
I long for Your salvation, O LORD,
And Your law is my delight.

And in Psalm 19, we find:

The law of the LORD is perfect, restoring the soul;
The testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.
The precepts of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart;
The commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.
The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever;
The judgments of the LORD are true; they are righteous altogether.
They are more desirable than gold, yes, than much fine gold;
Sweeter also than honey and the drippings of the honeycomb.
Moreover, by them Your servant is warned;
In keeping them there is great reward.

The New Testament contains many passages devoted to showing that the ceremonial parts of the Old Testament law were fulfilled by Christ’s sacrifice, and showing the utter inadequacy of any hope of being justified by one’s fulfillment of the moral law. Some Christians have taken this to mean that no part of God’s moral law is relevant to Christians today. After all, the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. This view is known as _antinomianism_. It is not the same as licentiousness, although sometimes it does lead there. A common variation of antinomianism among 21st century conservative evangelicals takes the view that we are subject to the Spirit _instead of_ the moral laws of God.

Is the Law bad? Should Christians ignore it? Is the very existence of the moral law antithetical to grace and Spirit and liberty? I do not believe the Bible teaches this at all.

Romans 6-8 is quite clear in identifying just what it is about the Law that is antithetical to Christianity, and just what we mean that we are “no longer under the law”.

Romans 8:2 For the _law_ of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has _set you free_ from the _law of sin and of death_.

It is the “law of sin and death” that we’ve been freed from. The wages of sin is death. The Law is not bad, it is merely weak _through the flesh_ (Romans 8:3) to produce righteousness. The Law is only “bad” insofar as it caused sin to increase (Romans 5:20) and condemned us (Romans 6:23). All the Law could do is condemn us and give sin the opportunity to enslave us (Romans 7:5, 7:7-11).

The Law is _good_. Romans 7:12 says “the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good”. Rom 7:14 tells us “the Law is spiritual”. Romans 7:16 says “the Law is good”.

The Law is not bad. It does not even enslave us! Romans 7:13 “Therefore did that which is good [the Law -RMW] become a cause of death for me? May it never be! Rather it was _sin_, in order that it might be shown to be sin by effecting my death through _that which is good_, so that through the commandment sin would become utterly sinful.”

Christ did not come to annul the Law. “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass form the Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:17-19) This immediately precedes Christ “tightening” the Law, as it were, in Matthew 5:21-48.

Nobody has ever been justified by the Law. Nobody. Ever! Not David, not Moses, not Abraham, not nobody! (Romans 3:20) The Law has never served that purpose. Salvation has always been by God’s grace through our faith in Him. That faith has been more or less clear at various points in history, but it’s always been based on faith in God’s goodness and mercy _alone_. See also Psalm 51.

So what is the moral Law good for? There are two scriptural purposes for the Law that have always been true and will always be true. The Law does not, and has not, and will not, justify anyone.

First of all, the Law gives us knowledge of our sins and shows us our need for God’s salvation.

* Romans 3:20 “by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin
* Romans 4:15 “the Law brings about wrath”
* Romans 5:20 “The Law came in so that the transgression would increase”

This is the function of the Law to the lost. It condemns. It shows them that they are in fact slaves to sin, and hopeless before a holy and just God.

But does the Law have any purpose for one of God’s elect, one of His redeemed children? Certainly! The second purpose of the Law is to show us how to live.

* Romans 7:12 “For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man”
* (All the verses from Psalm 19 and 119 I posted above).

Augustine wrote “The Law was given, in order that we might seek after grace. Grace was given, in order that we might fulfill the Law.”

This is not legalism. We are not justified, or even more accepted by God, based on our obedience to His moral law. Grace alone saves us. Works do not save, never have saved, never will save.

Christ summarized the Law as “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength”, and “Love your neighbor as yourself”. He clearly intended us to obey these two commands. How can we obey the summary but disregard that which was summarized? If the moral commands of the law are summarized in these two simple commands, then following the two greatest commandments will necessarily entail obedience to the moral commandments they encompass.

It’s “cool” to be an antinomian today. It’s hip to be into liberty and grace, and to cast a disdainful eye on approximately 2000 years of church history as the doings of a bunch of misguided legalists who didn’t “get” (as in, understand) grace. But it’s unbiblical. We should agree with the Bible that the Law is holy and spiritual and righteous and good! David found it a source of encouragement. So should we.

Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law. (Romans 3:31)

Satan’s Strategies (or not?)

Tuesday, November 11th, 2003

Sometimes I wonder if Satan has strategies that we don’t recognize. When we do actually give him any credit, we usually think in terms of very personal struggles. But is it possible that, like the US foreign policy, he’s as much concerned with subtle cultural changes as with destroying individuals?
(more…)

Back from Daddyland

Tuesday, November 11th, 2003

Leandra’s doctor said on Monday that the abruption was almost completely healed! He said to kind of take it easy, but things look fine. We’re all relieved.

I think my son Joshua might be the most relieved. When Mommy is on the couch and Daddy is in charge of cooking, cleaning, baths, etc., things are just a wee bit _different_. Heh.

One morning, Leandra made some wisecrack about how it was 9:30 and we were all still in our pajamas finishing breakfast. I retorted, “Welcome to Daddyland!” Joshua picked up on it and laughed “Mommy, you are _trapped_ in Daddyland!”

Later that night, though, it turned into more of a lament. “We’re _all_ trapped in Daddyland!” :-)
Leandra has a place for each of the toys. Some go in this drawer, others in that cabinet, some on that shelf, etc. This is not the case in Daddyland. I’d gotten some maternity clothes down out of the attic and Joshua had been playing in the box. So at the end of the day, we just put all the toys in the cardboard box. As we were cleaning up at the end of one day, Joshua looked at Leandra and said, sort of in a teasing way, “This is Daddyland, where toys go in boxes!”

One thing that is clearly better in Daddyland is bathtime. OK, so you might get some soap in your eyes. But the bath only takes 2 minutes and you get to play for like half an hour. And Daddy puts in ALL the bath toys, plus bubbles, plus some stuff that turns the water different colors.

But now Mommy is off the couch, and Daddyland has come to an end. I, for one, am glad to see it go!

(In my defense, I’m sure if I’d been a SAHD for the past 3 years, Daddyland would be just as nice as Mommyland.)

Pregnancy Update

Friday, November 7th, 2003

Leandra’s ob/gyn sent us to a specialist today who can do a “level 2 ultrasound”. He said that he didn’t see anything to be alarmed by, and “the prognosis for this pregnancy is very good”. He agreed with bed rest for a few more days to help it heal, but really nobody has indicated there’s anything very serious. He said everything looked perfectly normal as far as the baby’s development, and he was able to check lots of things that a regular ultrasound apparently can’t see.

Also, we found out the gender. It’s another boy! Leandra was kind of hoping for a girl, and I eventually want a girl as well, but we are both pretty amused at the thought of 3 boys running around.

We have another appointment with Leandra’s regular doctor on Monday to see how things are going. Things look pretty good right now. Hopefully the abruption will heal and she can have a more normal pregnancy.

God’s Velvet Hammer

Thursday, November 6th, 2003

I told my pastor I didn’t think it was necessary for him to aim this _entire_ sermon directly at me. He insists it wasn’t, but it sure felt like it. Which is just another way of saying, I was very convicted.

2 Timothy 2
24 The Lord’s bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged,
25 with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth,
26 and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.

Verse 24

_bond-servant_ - another word for slave. A person devoted to the cause or purpose of another, to the _disregard_ of his own interests.

If I’m a bond servant of God, I’m more committed to Him and His cause than I am to myself.

_not quarrelsome_ - Verse 23 says that foolish and ignorant speculations cause quarrels. A quarrelsome person is quick to debate in order to win.

_kind to all_ - to ALL. He has a gentle spirit, and is kind in his interaction with others, even if they are not kind to him. For example, if a debate gets heated, he remains kind.

_able to teach_ - The context of this (see verses 20-21) includes all Christians. We’re not all gifted as teachers, but we are all able to teach a little if we are mature. [See Hebrews 5:12]

_patient when wronged_ - cf Proverbs 19:11. I don’t have to confront every wrong, or address every time I’ve been offended.

Verse 25

_correcting_ We do have a responsibility to correct people, but do it gently. We should act like someone who got, _and still gets_, grace from God.

_if, perhaps, may_ - It is possible that others may come to Christ through your work IF your life looks like this (see v20-26)

_God may grant them repentance_ - No one can repent on their own apart from God’s grace. Repentance = a change of mind leading to knowledge of the truth.

_come to their senses_ - because God grants them repentance

_captive_ - They are doing Satan’s will, but they are his captives as well.

To be an effective voice of truth:

* I must see myself as the Lord’s bond-servant. This is not somebody else’s job.
* I must remember my need for grace and act accordingly toward others.
* I must have a growing and maturing understanding of the nature of spiritual warfare. The lost are captives that need to be set free, not my enemies.
* Don’t sugar coat the message. Sugar coat yourself instead.

That last point is really signficant to me. These verses come in the middle of Paul exhorting Timothy to “retain the standard of sound words”. The gospel is offensive enough - it doesn’t need my help!

I believe there is a message starting with 2:1 and running through 2:26. These verses define what an effective servant of Christ will look like.

* suffering hardship as a good soldier of Jesus
* being set apart as a soldier on duty or an athlete
* avoiding foolish controversies
* lining ourselves up with God’s word and being diligent about that
* cleansing ourselves from youthful lusts and instead pursuing righteousness, faith, love, and peace with other Christians
* being gentle to others

These are more or less prerequisites for effective service. If I do these things, others might listen to the message I’ll be preaching. If not, I’ll be useless for God (v 21).

Personal Update

Wednesday, November 5th, 2003

Well, the pregnancy saga continues. Leandra had some more bleeding on Sunday night after kind of a busy weekend. She called the doctor Monday morning and they told her to be there in an hour. The doctor put her on bed rest for a week. We go to Dallas on Friday for something callled a “Level 2 Ultrasound”, and then have a followup appointment on Monday with the ob/gyn to see how things look.

The doctor said that the abruption, which is what’s causing the bleeding, is not apparently any worse, but he wants to play it very safe. He also said that the reason the abruption hasn’t healed may be because our baby is very active and in jumping around inside the womb a lot, and there’s nothing we can do about that. I think this one is going to be a troublemaker. It must be a girl. :-)
There doesn’t seem to be any negative impact to the baby from the abruption. “Spot”, as I’ve _affectionately_ nicknamed this child, is quite large and quite active. The doctor says he doubts that there will be any complications, but that he’s never messed up a baby yet and does not intend to start with ours.