Archive for October, 2003

Why Be Separate

Friday, October 31st, 2003

Darren at LivingRoom quotes Letty Russell

This fear of difference is reinforced by a dualistic view of church and world that assigns good spiritual aspects to the church and evil material aspects to the surrounding world

in the context of churches being inclusive or exclusive.

I think this hits the nail right on the head, although I come at it from the opposite side as Darren. It is precisely this “dualistic” view of the church and the world that _drives_, not just _justifies_ my views on separation.

Jesus drew pretty stark contrasts with statements like “Whoever is not with me is against me”(paraphrase). There is no middle ground in scripture. You’re either a child of God or a child of Satan. Light and darkness, good and evil, right and wrong - these are the divisions Scripture presents us between those who have been reconciled to God and those who have not. You’re His follower or His enemy.

Paul writes in 2 Timothy 2:24-26 The Lord’s bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patiant when wrong, with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.

Do you view non-Christians as captives of Satan who do his will? Or do you see them as fundamentally good who just need a little bit of love and care?

I believe your answer to that question will dictate your beliefs about separation from the world.

Happy Halloween

Friday, October 31st, 2003

Well, it’s that time of year again. I know this is a big deal with some Christians. It’s not for me. IMHO, Halloween is all about candy and kids dressing up in cute costumes. But if you are one of those Christians who thinks otherwise, I just respectfully disagree with you. I don’t think you are self-righteous, have a weak faith, or anything else.

The first argument against Halloween is one of origins. It began as a pagan holiday honoring pagan gods and spirits, not all of which were very nice. To some extent, these traditions have been carried over to our Halloween celebrations.

However, Christmas and Easter have similarly dubious origins. The church has turned those two days into Christian holidays, but in the same way many of the original traditions are maintained. Can anyone tell me what bunnies, chicks, and boiled eggs have to do with Christ’s resurrection?

If you want to be consistent, you’d have to do away with Christmas gift-giving, do away with Rudolph and Santa and Christmas trees and all that, and replace it with a nativity scene and maybe a “Birthday party for Jesus”. All of our Easter traditions would go away - no more egg hunts! - and we’d celebrate Resurrection Sunday instead.

The other argument against Halloween is that it _continues_ to carry the same (or similar) signficance as it originally did, that it’s a day devoted to glorifying evil and Satan. And here, I think those who oppose Halloween have a point.

I believe that a lot of the things associated with Halloween are, in fact, celebrations of evil and improper for Christians (though I won’t even speculate as to whether or not they are sinful). Ghoulish, evil costumes, haunted houses, all that sort of stuff - I think Christians should not participate in that. Maybe I’m a neo-Pharisee legalist, but I think that’s a bit too close to imitating evil.

In the same vein, though, Christmas is often about toys. And just like we can celebrate Christmas without being too caught up in the commercialization, and retaining lots of extra-Biblical traditions, we can celebrate Halloween without sinning.

If it’s wrong for my 3 year old tiger and 1 year old lion to get bags of candy from our neighbors and family, well, I just don’t see it. And I’m sure that my life has many worse unrecognized sins than that. I’ll trust in God’s mercy and grace to forgive my ignorant sins, and in His Spirit to convict me of this if I’m wrong. But as far as I can tell, if you leave out all the gruesome and evil stuff, Halloween is about candy, children, and costumes, not the devil.

Temptation: Just Run Away

Tuesday, October 28th, 2003

I read a heartbreaking blog entry earlier today, about a pastor who apparently chose to commit adultery. And I also blogged a few days ago about a relative of mine who committed fornication and is now pregnant out of wedlock. Several weeks ago I learned that an elder from a church I used to be part of, a man in his 50s with two grown children and two grandchildren, a former schoolteacher, had abandoned his family and run off with an 18 year old former student of his. The relationship had been going on for at least 2 years, possibly longer.

When I hear about these things, oddly, my first thoughts are about my own vulnerability. If pastors and elders are vulnerable, what possible confidence can I have that I’m not also vulnerable? And in view of that, what can I do to lessen the chances that I’ll make the decision to sin just like all these people did?

1 Corinthians 10:12-14 Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall. No temptation has overtaken you but such as is common to man; and God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will provide the way of escape also, so that you will be able to endure it. Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry.

Matthew 6:13 And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from evil.

1 Timothy 6:11 But flee from these things, you man of God, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, perseverance and gentleness.

2 Timothy 2:22 Now flee from youthful lusts and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart.

1 Corinthians 6:12 All things are lawful for me, but not all things are profitable.

1 Corinthians 6:18 Flee immorality.

The Bible often calls us not to _overcome_ temptation, but to _flee_ from it. 1 Corinthians 10:12-13 tells us:

* When we think we’re strong, we’re actually vulnerable
* We all face pretty much the same temptations
* God’s has made provision for us to endure temptation
* That provision is an escape route

Proverbs frequently compares our life to walking along a street, and we’re told to not even get close to the house of the adulteress. We’re to keep our eyes fixed straight ahead, and not even to _look_ to the right or the left.

I mentioned an elder who ran off with a teenage girl earlier. I’m fairly sure how the relationship started, and I think it began entirely above board. Perfectly innocent. Nothing bad whatsoever. It was not sinful.

All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable.

In retrospect, it may not have been sinful, but it was _foolish_. It would have been better to forego the “neutral” relationship and have _fled_ from the temptation, to have taken God’s escape route as early as possible.

It’s true that nobody accidentally commits adultery. You make each decision willfully and knowingly. But it’s equally true that the situation you’ve gotten yourself into may strongly influence your decisions, and you might wind up making decisions that you wouldn’t have if those circumstances weren’t true.

A man generally commits adultery in his heart long before he does so in his flesh. It is the affiar of the heart that produces the affair of the flesh. And you have far less conscious control over your affections than you do your physical actions.

I’m in a small group Bible study with several couples that are close to my own age. Every last woman in that group is attractive. But right this minute, there is basically no chance at all that I would commit adultery with any of those women. I have not committed emotional adultery, so it’s unlikely that I’d commit physical adultery.

However, what if I were to foolishly wind up spending a lot of time with one of those women? What if we had long, deep conversations alone? What if I wound up getting myself emotionally attached (in an inappropriate way) to one of these women? If I were there to comfort her, to encourage her, etc., in a unique way? Do you think that might increase the odds that I’d choose to commit adultery given the opportunity? Of course it would.

Would it be _lawful_ for me to develop a deep relationship with a woman who is not my wife? Yeah, I think so. Nothing in the Bible forbids it. But would it be _profitable_? Clearly, it would be foolish, so I should avoid it now. Temptation, especially sexual immorality, is not to be withstood and overcome. It’s to be avoided, even fled from.

I believe boundaries are wise in a Christian’s life. It’s wise for me to put internet filters on my computer. If I’m tempted to look at things I shouldn’t, the filter provides an extra level of protection. It’s wise for me to not be alone with women other than my wife and relatives. It’s wise for me to have accountability in my life. It’s wise for me to put things in place to make it easier for me to flee temptation and harder to succumb to it.

Christians have no right to classify non-sinful things as sinful. I cannot look at you and say that you maintaining an emotionally intimate relationship with someone other than your spouse is _sinful_. The Bible says no such thing, as far as I know, and I cannot bind your conscience in such matters. But it’s not particularly difficult to recognize that, while it may or may not be sinful, it’s certainly dangerous and unwise. I don’t think it’s wrong for Christians to point out the potential danger and the relative wisdom of certain situations. In fact, I think we have a responsibility to each other to do this.

God’s law defines sin for us. We’re called to live lives of holiness. That is more than avoiding the “don’ts”. It’s not about keeping rules.

2 Timothy 2:22 tells us to _flee_ youthful lusts and _pursue_ certain good things. If all we’re doing is trying to not sin, we’re ignoring what sanctification really means. We’re also doing it the hard way. Fleeing from youthful lusts is a lot easier when I have something positive to pursue instead. At some point, it’s less about what you _shouldn’t_ do and more about what you _should_ do. And if you’re pursuing righteousness, godliness, faith, love, perseverance and gentleness, you won’t be flirting with sin and temptation. You won’t be standing right at the edge of the cliff. Your liberty will be used to serve others, not to serve your flesh and get away with everything that’s not strictly forbidden. And _that_ is what we’re called to, not to just avoid sin.

(Disclaimer: I am nowhere near the level of sanctification I just described! Don’t read this as “I’m so much better than you”, because I’m probably not.)

The Celestial Railroad

Thursday, October 23rd, 2003

I hadn’t heard of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Celestial Railroad before. If you’ve read Pilgrim’s Progress, you ought to read this too.

Doing What’s Right

Thursday, October 23rd, 2003

Alice (not her real name) is an 18 year old Christian young lady. Bob (not his real name) is a youth pastor in his mid-20s. Alice’s youth pastor, to be exact. Also her fiance.

And the father of her unborn child.

At first glance, this is pretty scandalous. Alice is my 2nd cousin, and I was pretty upset when I first heard. But after thinking about it for a while, there’s a lot of mitigating circumstances, and even some things Alice and Bob are to be praised for.
(more…)

Omnipotence

Thursday, October 23rd, 2003

God is omnipotent. But that doesn’t mean God can do _anything_ at all. In fact, there are several things God cannot do. Omnipotence means _nothing is too hard for God_.

Jeremiah 32:17, 27 contains the following exchange:
“Ah Lord God! Behold, You have made the heavens and the earth by Your great power and by Your outstretched arm! Nothing is too difficult for you,” … “Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh; is anything too difficult for Me?”

God can also do more than we can imagine:

Ephesians 3:20 Now to Him who is able to do far more abundantly beyond all that we ask or think…

On the other hand, if you asked God what my imaginary childhood friend looked like, He’d have no answer because that person never existed. Similarly, God cannot find the corner of a circle, as that is illogical. Nor can God create a rock so big He can’t lift it. That’s not too hard for Him, it’s just illogical. Such a rock cannot logically exist. It’s like asking “what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object?” By definition, only one of those entities can exist at one time within the universe. The existence of one denies the existence of the other. The existence of an immovable rock denies the existence of an omnipotent God. That rock does not, and cannot exist. So it’s a silly question.

God also cannot do certain things which violate His will and character.

Hebrews 6:18 - so that by two unchangeable things in which _it is impossible for God to lie_, we who have taken refuge would have strongb encouragement to take hold of the hope set before us.

2 Timothy 2:13 - If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for _He cannot deny Himself_.

(All scripture NASB. Emphasis added)

The fact that these things are impossible for God should actually be a source of great comfort to those who love Him. It doesn’t mean He’s less than omnipotent. It means He is _trustworthy_. Man can lie. God cannot. Which is more perfect?

The fact that nothing is too difficult for God means we can trust that He is _capable_ of keeping that which we’ve committed to Him. He’s strong enough to rescue us from any danger, and strong enough to keep His promises. The fact that it is impossible for God to act against His character means we can trust that He _will_ keep those promises to His children.

[From my systematic theology class.]

Everyone Welcome?

Tuesday, October 21st, 2003

Leighton Tebay asks if church should be for committed Christians only, or if Christians with less of a committment should be included.

Should a church accept everyone regardless of their commitment to Jesus Christ?

Christians Stink

Sunday, October 19th, 2003

Let’s be honest: Christians stink! Or at least, we ought to.

2 Corinthians 2:15-16

For we are a fragrance of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing; to the one an aroma from death to death, to the other an aroma from life to life.

Christians smell like Christ. For those who are saved, or are elect but not yet converted, we generally will smell like a sweet perfume. For those who are not repentant, though, we stink like a rotting corpse.
(more…)

RC Sproul Jr on Antinomianism

Friday, October 17th, 2003

RC Sproul Jr on Antinomianism

Such a doctrine earns its stripes as the glorious gospel in a simple enough manner?it is the enemy of legalism. Add to that how soft and sweet it looks. Legalists, after all, are those grim looking people that are always telling you not to drink or smoke (or, grimmer still, telling you babies are a blessing, and spending the school day with them is a blessing too).

The antinomians, on the other hand, are warm hearted caring folk. I mean, if you?re going to err, isn?t it better to err on the side of grace?

Hanging Out With Sinners

Thursday, October 16th, 2003

“You know, the Pharisees criticized Jesus for hanging out with sinners, too.”

I’ve heard/read comments to that effect many times. It’s usually trotted out any time one Christian criticizes another for being too involved with the world. It’s used as the Biblical basis for relationship evangelism, “investing in the lives of unbelievers” (whatever that means), seeker-sensitive churches, and generally any level of involvement with unrepentant sinners or ungodly culture.

But how applicable, or even accurate, is this? If we want to imitate Christ, we’d better be sure that we know what He did. If we’re going to ask, “What would Jesus do?” we must first know the answer “What _did_ Jesus do?”.

As I examine the Bible, I find that Jesus did not “hang out” with unrepentant sinners, at least not in the way we usually mean that when we want to do so.
(more…)