Archive for January, 2003

Infant Left to Die in Port-A-Potty

Friday, January 24th, 2003

ABCNEWS.com : Infant Left to Die in Toilet, Law Debated

Gabriel Estrada, 18, will appear in Kenosha County court to face attempted first-degree intentional homicide charges for allegedly leaving his newborn son to die in a portable park toilet hours after the baby’s birth on Jan. 13.

After his girlfriend gave birth, Estrada opted not to follow her wish that he drop the infant off at a church or at a police station. Instead, … Estrada abandoned his son, realizing the tiny boy would likely die in below-freezing temperatures.

Gabriel Estrada remains jailed on $500,000 cash bond and could face up to 60 years in prison if convicted.

[The rest of the article is a discussion of the effectiveness of child safe haven laws, such as Wisconsin has, that provide the ability to abandon newborns at hospitals, police stations, and fire stations and be protected from prosecution.]

Estrada had months to think about what to do when the baby was born and this is the best plan he could come up with? Let it die? Couldn’t he at least put the baby in a basket, left it on a doorstep, knocked, and ran?

Whatever they decide to do to Gabriel Estrada, his punishment should include being left wet and naked in a dark port-a-potty on a cold Wisconsin winter night for a few hours.

Praise the Lord that someone saved that little baby from such an awful death. And praise the Lord that they caught the monster(s) that left him there to die.

Obligatory Abortion Post

Wednesday, January 22nd, 2003

It’s always been somewhat disconcerting to me that my birthday is on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. I was born two years after the US Supreme Court overrode Texas state law and permitted abortion on demand.

I believe abortion is infanticide; it’s murder. There are only a handful of situations I can imagine justifying an abortion - things such as a tubal pregnancy, or situations in which the mother certainy would die as a result of the birth.

I believe that the only two logical answers to “when does life begin” are “at conception” or “at birth”. Those are the only two discernable, non-gradual changes I’m aware of in a baby’s development. If you choose any other point (say, the end of the first trimester), I’ll simply ask “What about just one day before? Just one day?” over and over again to demonstrate that your selection is entirely arbitrary.

I can’t imagine that anyone who has seen a late-term sonogram or felt a baby move while still in the womb would agree that life begins at birth. So the only logical candidate for the beginning of life is the moment of conception.

My belief that life begins at conception is also established from scripture. In Jeremiah, God says that He knows us even before He forms us in the womb. And in Psalms, we read a description of God forming us. Now how God knows an unviable mass of tissue is beyond me. The idea that He knows baby humans before they are born, now that makes sense.

Clearly, if a developing baby is alive, it is a living human being. And consequently it’s murder to kill that baby, except possibly in the most exceptional circumstances.

I’ll even go further. I have a hard time condemning those who kill abortionists. What I mean is, I feel (”feel”, not necessarily “think” - those words have different meanings!) that it’s wrong to shoot an abortionist, but I’m not at all sure why it’s wrong. The only resolution I can come to is that it’s legal, and God has not entrusted the sword to me to execute judgment. I’m quite certain that a great many doctors and nurses, women who’ve had abortions, and other folks who have encouraged or financed abortion, will be held accountible by God one day.

I take some comfort in knowing that God is just, and that these people will pay for their horrific sins unless they repent. And I also believe that God keeps those murdered babies with Him in heaven. I can’t prove that scripturally, but neither can the inverse be proven, so I hold it solely as an opinion based on my understanding of the character of God.

A couple of years ago, a pastor of mine, on the Sunday following 1/22, had all people born since 1/22/73 stand at the front of the church. I remember watching all the children walk down front. When my wife and I made our way down, I remember the preacher looking at us (and a few other people our age) in amazement and saying “You too? I didn’t realize how long it had been!”

30 years of legalized murder is atrocious. God rained down fire from heaven on Sodom and Gomorrah for crimes that I think pale in comparison to ours. I hate to think what His punishment on us might be like.

Churches Turn up Volume with Big Sound Systems

Tuesday, January 14th, 2003

Churches Turn Up Volume With Big Sound Systems (washingtonpost.com)

Five centuries ago, church designers introduced massive pipe organs to fill sanctuaries with music and draw the masses into spiritual oneness with God. Today, elaborate sound and video systems are rapidly becoming the worship enhancer of choice.

“Worship is a form of entertainment,” said Al Perry, technical adviser for media ministry at Fort Foote Baptist Church in Fort Washington, which included a $300,000 audiovisual system as part of a $6 million sanctuary it completed a year ago. “If people are not entertained, they don’t feel like they’re participating.”

Strategically placed cameras show pastors, performers and congregants from various angles, with their images projected on wall-size screens. Some video directors mix it up, showing clips from a mission trip on one screen while the choir sings on another. The screens also are used to display lyrics or Bible verses — or a message to the parents of a child who has just fallen in the nursery.

First Baptist of Glenarden will spend more than $700,000 on electronic equipment in the $25 million, 4,000-seat sanctuary scheduled for groundbreaking this summer, said Deacon Oscar Grant, director of media ministry. The design includes six digital cameras, two 12-by-20-foot projection screens and computerized lighting to provide color and spot effects for the pulpit and stage areas. The system will allow for immediate availability of worship services on DVD, CD, videotape and audiotape, he said.

Ephesians 5:19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord;

Colossians 3:16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.

Worship is not entertainment. The audience of worship is God. The congregation are the performers, not the audience. Our participation is not based on being entertained!

How Tax Cuts Work

Tuesday, January 7th, 2003

Let’s put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men — the poorest — would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1, the sixth would pay $3, the seventh $7, the eighth $12, the ninth $18, and the tenth man — the richest — would pay $59.

That’s what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement — until one day, the owner threw them a curve (in tax language a tax cut). “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20.” So now dinner for the ten only cost $80.00.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six — the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his “fair share?”

The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being PAID to eat their meal. So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of his earlier $59.

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got a dollar out of the $20,” declared the sixth man, but he, (pointing to the tenth) got $7!”. “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man, “I only saved a dollar, too, ……..It’s unfair that he got seven times more than me!”. That’s true!” shouted the seventh man, why should he get $7 back when I got only $2?” The wealthy get all the breaks!”. Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night he didn’t show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered, a little late what was very important. They were FIFTY-TWO DOLLARS short of paying the bill!

Imagine that!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. Where would that leave the rest?

[From an email I received, attributed to "T. Davies" of the University of South Dakota]

Here is information from the Congressional Budget Office with more detailed numbers.
Here is a FoxNews.com story about the tax burden breakdown by income.