<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I&#8217;m Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.williamsonline.us/2004/02/what-im-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.williamsonline.us/2004/02/what-im-reading/</link>
	<description>I am crucified with Christ, and yet I live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://robert.williamsonline.us/2004/02/what-im-reading/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.williamsonline.us/?p=640#comment-526</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read it yet (although it&#039;s on my list), but I don&#039;t think McClaren is one of the arrogant &quot;change or die&quot; types. I think it&#039;s more about asking the questions about how well our modern view of/approach to God is helping people walk with Him, and how those people it&#039;s not working for can view/approach God in a way that fits them better. I&#039;m not talking about rejecting uncomfortable doctrine or anything like that, and from what I&#039;ve heard he isn&#039;t really either. What I means is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailyrandom.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_dailyrandom_archive.html#107229068859291980&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;there are no forumlas with God,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; something the Rick Warrens of the world don&#039;t seem to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read it yet (although it&#8217;s on my list), but I don&#8217;t think McClaren is one of the arrogant &#8220;change or die&#8221; types. I think it&#8217;s more about asking the questions about how well our modern view of/approach to God is helping people walk with Him, and how those people it&#8217;s not working for can view/approach God in a way that fits them better. I&#8217;m not talking about rejecting uncomfortable doctrine or anything like that, and from what I&#8217;ve heard he isn&#8217;t really either. What I means is that <a href="http://dailyrandom.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_dailyrandom_archive.html#107229068859291980" rel="nofollow">&#8220;there are no forumlas with God,&#8221;</a> something the Rick Warrens of the world don&#8217;t seem to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

